logo

Performance at Work

All of our research projects are designed to generate evidence to improve performance at work, for instance:

Performance and presenteeism: Corporate Sponsor cash has enabled BOHRF to fund the creation of an exciting database by researchers at Keele University This comprises the worldwide literature of 20,000 unique references and almost 2,000 peer reviewed research papers on health, performance, presenteeism, and interventions to achieve optimal performance at work. (See Musculoskeletal DisordersPerformance and presenteeism: new systematic evidence review

to top of page

Current Projects


Health and performance at work: systematic evidence review: evaluating the impact of back, neck and upper limb pain on work performance and absence

This systematic evidence review “Evaluating the impact of back, neck and upper limb pain on work performance and absence” will interrogate the database referred to on our “Performance at Work” page in order to:

  • Summarise the evidence on the overall impact of back, neck and upper limb pain on work performance and absence.
  • Assess the separate impacts of back, neck and upper limb pain on work performance and absence.
  • Describe the range of outcome measures, used to assess work performance for people with these conditions.
  • Evaluate the measures found in terms of their reliability and validity.

This work is expected to be completed in the summer of 2009.

to top of page


Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: its effectiveness in organisations and comparison with other CBT methods

BOHRF is funding a feasibility study to find out whether internet based CBT (MoodGYM which is freely available on the internet) is effective in reducing anxiety and depression; and in improving performance at work and attendance at work. At the same time it will evaluate the user satisfaction and cost effectiveness of this approach compared with alternatives. If the objectives of the feasibility study are achieved, then it is anticipated that BOHRF will fund the full pragmatic randomized control trial.

Nearly three in ten of all employees will have a mental health problem of some sort in any given year. People with anxiety and depression take 3½ times as many days off work as people with no mental disorder.

The approach being taken by this research is innovative in that:

  • it avoids the fear of stigma that some people have
  • it avoids the risk of being “labeled” as “mentally ill” due to health centre visit when such labeling is not necessary
  • it seeks to demonstrate effectiveness within the workplace (rather than clinical setting)
  • it will compare effectiveness with treatment as usual
  • it is the first randomized control trial on cCBT in an organisational setting

to top of page

Last Update: 04-Apr-2010